beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
However, for two years from the date of the conclusion of this judgment against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the owner of Suwon-si D Building, and E is the person who leases the second floor of the above building and operates the F PC.
Defendant
A, in order to interfere with the above PC businesses of Defendant B and G in order to prevent disputes related to lease agreements, such as lease agreements, including E and rent, and accordingly, Defendant B and G instructed Defendant B and G to “to prevent from entering the PC customers at night,” and accordingly, Defendant B and G from January 2010.
2. Until the first patrolman, the said bank allowed visitors to enter the PC room in such a manner as: (a) holding the entrance door gates at night while controlling the entrance of the said building; (b) keeping customers who are able to enter the PC room; and (c) keeping customers who locked out from the PC room out of the said room out of the PC.
1. The Defendant: (a) around October 27, 2010, at the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council of 9-24-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, 25-24, B met with the Defendant; (b) at the court of Suwon District Court 201, the Defendant asked the Defendant to request the Defendant to testify as a witness; and (c) made the Defendant sign a written confirmation with the Defendant.
However, unlike the actual contents of the defendant's instructions to B, there was a false statement stating that "at all times of service, the door was set open without locking, and most underground people who were ordered to leave the door are the people who want to see or see, and thus, they did not receive control instructions from those who are placed on the upper floor, but they did not completely control the upper floor because they did not receive control instructions."
As above, the Defendant shows a written confirmation indicating the contents of B's testimony, and caused B to be present at the court and to have him feel perjury, and caused him to attend the court as a witness of the defendant's obstruction of business, and entered the above written confirmation and contents as stated in paragraph (2).