1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The text of the judgment of the court of first instance is set forth.

1. The appellate court, which cited the facts of recognition of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall accept the facts of recognition in this case, except in the following cases, as stated in the item of “1. Facts of recognition” for the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, this shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of

Part 4 of the first instance judgment of the first instance court stating that “At present, the appellate court is pending in the appellate court as Seoul Central District Court 2019No4215,” in the first instance judgment, the Defendant and the Prosecutor appealed, but the appellate court (Seoul Central District Court 2019No4215) dismissed all the appeals of the Defendant and the Prosecutor on July 15, 2020, and the Defendant appealed against this.”

2. The judgment of the defendant is as follows: 627,443,400 won (=325,00,000 won for promissory notes with the face value of goods in the train radio system 357,500,000 won excluding value-added tax 32,50,000 won; 281,503,400,940,000 won for promissory notes with the face value of construction work for H trains 23,034,000 won for promissory notes with the value of value-added tax 2,094,000 won; 325,000,000,000 won for damages due to the illegal act ; 2.1.5% of the annual application for the amendment of the former Act No. 945, Nov. 21, 2015 to May 31, 2019; 3.5.1.5% of the legal interest rate of 201, etc.