logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.11.06 2015고단849
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 16, 2015, at around 13:20, the Defendant took a video image showing that the Defendant she was in front of the elevator at the Yasan-si B apartment, the victim C (the victim 20 years of age) was able to take a shower voice, and then she was able to take a shower image with the window of a bath room opened before the victim’s house by moving the victim’s home to a corridor.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using smartphone cameras against his will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and Article 14 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant, even before and after the same crime was committed, did not reflect the previous history of having been sentenced to suspension of indictment; and (b) the Defendant taken a shower image of the victim’s body; (c) the Defendant deleted the video after the instant crime, destroyed evidence; and (d) did not fit circumstances after the crime, such as re-expling the victim’s residence without the consent of the victim for the purpose of deceiving the victim’s death, etc., it seems necessary to punish the

However, in full view of the favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes and does not repeat again, and other factors of sentencing as shown in the arguments in this case, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment as shown in the text shall be determined.

registration of personal information and.

arrow