logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.10 2017고정3744
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving a golf car.

On September 13, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 17:55, and proceeded along one lane from the 388 Don-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, to the 388 Don-do, Hanyang-gu, Seoul, with the view to the protection of the new historical distance.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others according to the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and has a duty of care to ensure that the driver has a duty of care to safely report the traffic situation on the

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, and was driving by C(42) of a victim (42) who was standing in front of Bracks due to the failure to operate Bracks.

DMW car back part of the Defendant’s vehicle was concealed into the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing his duties, sustained injury, such as “finite catum,” which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and at the same time damaged the repair cost of approximately KRW 948,926, such as exchange of back finites.

2. Despite the fact that a motor vehicle, which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Loss, is prohibited from being operated on the road, the Defendant operated the said motor vehicle without mandatory insurance at the same date and place as that of the above “1.”

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused;

1. A statement of the occurrence of traffic accidents prepared C;

1. Reporting of a traffic accident, reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident, inquiry into mandatory insurance, vehicles under obligation, and photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written diagnosis and estimate;

1. The relevant legal provisions of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

arrow