logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고정1466
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Violation of Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving of a driver car with a soil.

On March 14, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 17:00 on March 14, 2016, and proceeded with the road to the right side of the Red-dong Seoul, Seomun-gu, Seoul, to the right side of the Red-gu (Seoul) in the direction of the shill road at the shill road at the shill road at the shill road at the s

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as reducing speed and accurately operating the steering gear and brake system of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to accurately operate the brakes, etc. at the front of the vehicle in front of the victim C(49) driving, which was temporarily parked in the front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant, caused the back of the victim E(37 years old) driving on the front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant, and caused the said damaged vehicle to have the back part of the F Spon car of the victim E(37 years old) driving.

As a result, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, destroyed the property to be equivalent to KRW 985,918 on the vehicles owned by the victim C, and damaged the victim E with the injury of the “influent salt and tension” in the number of days of treatment, and the damaged vehicle with the repair cost of KRW 492,100 on the damaged vehicle.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is the holder of BND and passenger cars.

Despite the fact that a motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance is prohibited from being operated on the road, the Defendant operated the said motor vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at a section of about 17 km from the front of the 161st day of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Month to the road in its inner circulation of the Hongdong-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1.C and E, respectively.

arrow