logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.30 2016누77843
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Part II, the second part of which is removed or added, is referred to as “family members” as “family members and their neighbors.”

“No. 4” in the third place of conduct shall add “No. 5-1, 2” to the following:

The third-class 12 to 18 shall be advanced as follows:

Inasmuch as the instant case alleged by the Plaintiff may be threatened with a baby’s appearance, it is merely likely that a threat may be posed by a specific individual, and it seems possible to be protected by reporting it to the Moroc Police, etc. In addition, “persecution” refers to “any act causing serious infringement or discrimination on essential human dignity, including threats to life, body, or freedom,” and as alleged by the Plaintiff, even if the rape victim becomes subject to social criticism and criticism in Islamic cultural area, it is difficult to view that it constitutes gambling as stipulated in the Refugee Convention.”

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow