1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, except for the dismissal or addition as follows and the addition of the judgment on the plaintiffs' allegations in the following paragraphs, and thus, it is consistent with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2 The following shall be added to "inception to a hospital, who is under medical treatment after being transferred to the hospital, but on April 16, 2013".

6) Parts 5 of the same part is as follows. 【G was engaged in the business of visiting and selling cosmetics of the Mery case Korea Limited Company (hereinafter “Mery case”) and was paid KRW 2,431,050 as allowances in the month less than 29,405 won for which allowances were paid according to the business performance. The sum of allowances received is total of KRW 14,297,449, and total of KRW 4,604,032 from February to January 2014.

】 6쪽 [인정근거]에 “메리케이에 대한 사실조회결과”를 추가한다. 8쪽 ② 부분을 아래와 같이 고친다. 【G이 메리케이로부터 얻은 소득이 매월 일정하지 않은데다가 2012. 2.부터 2013. 1.까지는 월 평균 약 119만 원(≒ 14,297,449원 ÷ 12개월), 2013. 2.부터 2014. 1.까지는 월 평균 약 38만 원(≒ 4,604,032원 ÷ 12개월)을 얻었을 뿐인 점, 더욱이 위 소득은 G의 생계비 등으로도 지출되어야 할 것이므로 위 소득 중 일부만이 E, F의 생계비로 쓰일 수 있는 점 등을 종합하면, E, F은 망인이 매월 지급한 양육비로 생계의 대부분을 유지하고 있었다고 봄이 타당하다.

A person shall be appointed.

2. The Plaintiffs asserts that even in this Court, E and F may receive support from G, while the Plaintiffs do not have any right to receive support, they should be viewed as the beneficiaries of the survivors’ compensation annuity.

However, as seen earlier, E/F maintained most of its livelihood with the child support paid by the Deceased.