beta
Text
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence is published.
Reasons
1. Defendant A is the representative of the C Agricultural Partnership in the South-west Navy G from March 1, 2010 to the date, Defendant B is the representative director of H Co., Ltd. (Establishment on January 17, 2014) whose trade name has been changed from April 3, 2009 to the date, and Defendant C Co., Ltd is a corporation established for the purpose of developing, distributing, and selling I food, and Defendant D Co., Ltd is a corporation established for the purpose of civil and construction works.
1. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A and Defendant B
A. When the Defendants violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) and the Subsidy Management Act were selected as a subsidized business of the National Treasury related to the construction of the I factory by Defendant A as a subsidized business of the National Treasury related to the construction of the “I factory by J,” the construction contract in the form was concluded with C Agricultural Association and H Co., Ltd. (Representative B), and the actual construction is decided to be L operating the K Co., Ltd., and the construction cost actually added to the construction cost actually used was recruited to receive government subsidies.
Defendant
A A as part of the “201 M in 201,” which proceeds from the border border around May 4, 2011, filed an application for the “I factory construction project using J” with the “I factory construction project in South Sea,” and was selected as the auxiliary project operator of the said project on June 16, 201 (the national subsidy of KRW 500,000,000, local subsidy of KRW 200,000,000, and the local subsidy of KRW 300,000,000).
Despite the fact that H does not actually construct the above I factory and entered into the above I factory construction with Defendant A, the Defendants prepared a business commencement report, a false private construction contract contract between the said corporation and H under the name of the said corporation and H, and submitted it to the victim South-Nam-gun. On January 2012, 201, as if H actually completed the construction of the above I factory, the Defendants were “I factory using J” with the false construction completion contract, construction cost statement, etc.