logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.04.03 2018나35637
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The reasoning of this part cited by this Court is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, in addition to closing or adding the following contents to the “1. Basic Facts” of the judgment of the first instance, and therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. The third side of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is dismissed or added, is the "Evidence Nos. 1 through 9 of E" with the "Evidence Nos. 1 through 10 of E".

The fifth to sixth shall be added from the fifth to fourth of the judgment of the first instance as follows.

I. The Intervenor E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant’s Intervenor E”)

(A) Around July 2016, Defendant B’s “project implementer’s consent” (hereinafter “instant project”) is provided with all documents, including the “Agreement on the Change of the project implementer.”

A) The application for the change of the designation of a project implementer and the change of the authorization of the implementation plan was submitted to Chuncheon City Mayor. The above “Agreement on the change of the project implementer” states that “Defendant B transferred the status of the Defendants’ assistant participant E as the project implementer of the instant project, and the Chuncheon City agrees to designate the Defendants’ assistant participant E as the project implementer of the instant case. Defendant B assumes that no condition is added to the Chuncheon City and the Defendants’ assistant participant E in the process of changing the status of the permission authority for the instant project as the project implementer. Defendant B agrees to the transfer of all the rights stated in the said document to the Defendants’ assistant participant E by issuing the letter of delegation related to the change of the project implementation right (transfer), L Co., Ltd., Ltd., Q Q Co., Ltd, and R Co., Ltd. around August 2015, the letter of consent to the change of the project owner, the letter of consent to the change of the project owner, and the letter of consent to the change of the project owner (transfer).”

arrow