logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.07.18 2017누41544
장기요양급여비용환수결정 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

If the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “joint care for the elderly” in the 8 through 9th part of the judgment of the court of first instance is high from the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance to the 3rd part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “No. 6 subparag. 9” in the 4th part of the judgment of the court of first instance to the 4th part of the judgment of first instance to the 9 and 10th, and the following is added (the defendant stated “B” as “B,” and the name of the plaintiff is written only in the separate “representative” column of the disposition of this case or in the recipient column of the above scheduled notice of the disposition of this case to the 4th part of the judgment of first instance to the 4th part of the judgment of first instance.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow