1. The defendant shall pay the following amount to the plaintiff:

(a) 165,00,000 won;

B. As regards KRW 55,00,000, February 12, 2015

1. According to the purport of Gap evidence No. 3, Eul evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 2 and Eul evidence No. 2 as to the cause of the claim, according to the purport of the whole pleadings and evidence No. 1, 24, 2014; 5,000,000 won; c; 2, on February 5, 2015, 2014; 50,000,000 won; 4,000 won; 50,000 won per annum after the due date; 10,000 won per annum 5,00 won per annum 20,000 won per annum 5,000,000 won per annum 20,000 won per annum 5,000 won per annum 6,000,000 won per annum 20,000 won per annum 5,000 won per annum 20,000 won per annum, respectively.

2. The defendant's argument regarding the defendant's assertion is asserted that B was bound to pay only the above amount to the plaintiff since all of the bills of this case from the plaintiff at a discount of KRW 135,402,80. However, the defendant's argument does not affect the plaintiff's claim of this case. Thus, the defendant's argument above is without merit without further review.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted as reasonable.