logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.04.19 2017고단6549
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On November 12, 2015, the Defendant conspired with “C” where his personal information is unknown, and filed an application for the issuance of a credit card with the victim’s new credit card company via the Internet at a place where the location cannot be known, and the Defendant submitted the name name entered as the head of the department D, the details of deposits received from the Defendant as wages from “C”, the details of earned income collection receipts, and one credit card was issued from the victim.

However, the defendant did not have worked in D, and there was no special income at the time of application for credit card, and there was no asset in possession and there was no intention or ability to pay the credit card price even if the goods were purchased by the credit card.

In collusion with “C”, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) paid an amount of KRW 48,00 of the Olleh Communications Fee by a new card at a place where it is impossible to identify the place around May 13, 2016; and (c) from that time, until June 14, 2016, the Defendant obtained financial benefits equivalent to the same amount by failing to pay the amount to the victim, even though he/she paid a total of KRW 35,051,50,000 by the foregoing method, as described in the list of crimes 1 attached hereto, until June 14, 2016.

B. On June 1, 2016, the Defendant conspired with the “C” as indicated in paragraph (1), filed an application for the issuance of a credit card with the Defendant Hyundai Card Co., Ltd. at a place where the location of around June 1, 2016 is unknown. On June 7, 2016, the Defendant received one copy of the Hyundai Card M3 Credit Card from the victim’s employees on the Daegu-gu E building and the third floor.

However, the defendant did not have any special import at the time of application for credit card, and even if he purchased goods with the credit card because of the lack of assets in possession, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the card price.

The Defendant is “C”.

arrow