beta
Text
1. Of the 2,025 square meters of H-gun H Forest land in Chungcheongnam-gun, Defendant C shall have the share of 3/11, Defendant D, E, F, and G, respectively.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. From August 3, 1984, the ownership transfer registration has been made in the name of the network I for the forest H 2,025 square meters (hereinafter “the forest in this case”).
B. On the other hand, the deceased J died on January 10, 2015 as the relationship that was living in the village such as the deceased I, and its heir is the plaintiffs who are their children.
The deceased I died on October 20, 2001, and there are the defendants who are their spouses or children.
The Defendants’ inheritance shares are 3/11, Defendant D, E, F, and G, respectively. 2/11.
C. At present, the instant forests and fields have a grave, such as the Plaintiffs’ increased parents.
【Ground of recognition” without any dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, 2-1 through 3, Gap evidence 6-1, 2, and 7-1 through 14, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiffs asserted that, around April 30, 201, the deceased J, the father of the deceased, purchased the forest of this case from the deceased I on or around April 1994, and thus, the deceased J, as preliminary reasons for sale, occupied and used the forest of this case in peace and public performance with the intention to own the forest of this case for at least 20 years from April 1994 to 20 years, and therefore, the Defendants, the deceased I’s heir, are liable to implement the procedure for the transfer of ownership of the forest of this case to the plaintiffs in proportion to their respective inheritance shares.
B. We examine the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of each of the above evidence, Gap evidence and evidence Nos. 3 through 6, and the whole purport of the arguments and arguments in K and L's testimony, <1> The witness K had a netJ, which had been in need of mediation by requesting the sale and purchase mediation of the forest of this case to the party concerned as it is necessary for the L'I to do so; <2> The witness L, who was residing in the village such as the G's I and the L's J, is a witness, etc. who testified in detail as to the reason for the mediation, the circumstances at the time of the sale, etc.