1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts are the same as the reasons stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff purchased the land of this case from the network D, which is part of the forest land before subdivision, from the network D where the Plaintiff’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her she she

B. The Plaintiff is seeking to cancel the registration of ownership preservation based on the right to claim exclusion of interference based on ownership on the premise that the deceased J purchased the forest of this case from the deceased D, and thus, first, I would like to examine whether the deceased J purchased the forest of this case from the deceased D.

According to the evidence evidence Nos. 10 through 12, the fact that the network D entered into a contract for a sale of each of the two forest areas located in the deceased J and the short-gun L on September 28, 1921 and prepared a sale certificate with the network J as the purchaser is recognized, but it is insufficient to recognize the fact that only one of the above two forest areas indicates the forest area of this case, and there is no other evidence to support the fact that the network J purchased the forest of this case from the network D.

Rather, according to the overall purport of Gap evidence 10 to 12, Eul evidence 1-1, Eul evidence 2-1, Eul evidence 2-2, Eul evidence 3-5 (including each number), Eul evidence 12-2, and Eul evidence 12, the above contract of the camping shall be binding upon the registration after the forest situation is completed.