logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.04.10 2017고단2584
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving a car BK3.

On October 30, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 10:05 and changed the course from the first lane to the second lane while driving the road in front of the school square from the area of peace shooting distance to the area of the south side market.

In this case, there was a duty of care to safely change lanes by notifying the direction of direction in advance and keeping the traffic situation of the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not find a car in the D SP drive of the victim C (Y, 64 years old) who was driving in the middle of the two lanes, and caused the injury to the victim among the permanent vertebal disorder caused by damage to the 14 weeks of cirical water that requires approximately 14 weeks of treatment due to the change of the vehicle due to the negligence in the course of business.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

(b) Withdrawal of wishing to punish a motor vehicle after filing an indictment: A written agreement on the motor vehicle accident of the motor vehicle on January 17, 2018;

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow