logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2019.08.27 2017가단6485
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 2, 2014, the deceased H she went to an emergency room of the I Hospital (hereinafter “the instant hospital”) operated by the Defendant Incorporated Foundation G (hereinafter “Defendant Foundation”) (hereinafter “Defendant Foundation”) due to the fluence of the fluence, and discharged the hospital by fluence after the injection.

The doctor in charge explained the possibility of the progress of the wing salt due to the wing stone to the network H at the time, and explains that the CT inspection is necessary if the wing stone is re-written.

B. On May 6, 2015, the deceased H went to the emergency room of the instant hospital due to the fluence of the fluence book, and was hospitalized in the department outside of the instant hospital to undergo surgery.

The net H was inspected by the instant hospital on the same day.

C. On May 7, 2015, the J of the film department of the instant hospital read the result of the CR examination on the deceased H, stating, “Along with a wide area of a fluored bottle, there is a wall that has been laid down in the gludial bottom, and 3§¯ density is lower between neighboring S5 (Divided part). It does not seem to be meaningful in the bludial door and the bludial part. Along with a gludial door, it was turned over between the gludite and the gludder. It is deemed that many small parts are covered under the brud below the closure, and thus the same shall apply to all others.”

Defendant F diagnosed that he had an acute reciting salt without verifying the J’s reading as above, and performed an operation to remove the hH’s gate on May 8, 2015.

The deceased H was hospitalized after the operation, and discharged on May 15, 2015.

E. On May 21, 2015, Defendant F expressed to the network H the view that the wing cancer is doubtful, and the network H was inspected by the instant hospital on May 22, 2015.

On June 1, 2015, Defendant F explained to Plaintiff A that it was transferred to the network H’s cancer due to inter-band closure, etc., and recommended the Plaintiff to correct aviation cancer treatment using drugs.

F. On October 22, 2015, the network H died due to cancer transferred to the entire body.

The plaintiffs are children of the deceased H.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, A No. 1.

arrow