1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The parties concerned are juristic persons operating the Mannam University Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”). The Plaintiff is a person who has received a saton saton saton saton saton saton saton saton saton saton satons

On September 14, 2014, the Plaintiff was in the emergency room at B Hospital from September 14, 2014 to the left-hand chest, and returned home to the opinion that there is no special error in the heart (EG ECG, elgrapyy) examination at the heart gate (CEG ECG, and the heart gateer’s inspection. The Plaintiff, etc., was influord with an inner pain on September 14, 2014, and was in the emergency room at B Hospital again around 18:51 on September 14, 2014, the Plaintiff was influor of X-ray and CT ray, and was influor of 5.73 cm x x 23 cm x m20 m20 m20 m25 m20 m25 m2014 m25 m2014.

3) On September 15, 2014, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at Defendant Hospital on or around 17:10 on the same day, and on or around September 18, 2014, and was hospitalized at Defendant Hospital, and on September 18, 2014, under the house of Defendant C, a dental doctor, it is deemed to perform the instant operation (hereinafter “instant operation”).

(1) After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff complained of the pains of the instant surgery, and 1) The Plaintiff continued to appeal for the pains of the surgery after the instant surgery, but repeated to the instant hospital, which had been on September 24, 2014, due to pain management, such as the medical control administration by the Defendant hospital, and transferred the instant hospital to the D Hospital on September 24, 2014.

2. On October 6, 2014, the Plaintiff complained of a scarcity pain at the Defendant Hospital at the time of outpatient treatment, who was hospitalized in the hospital and was under the preservation to reduce the pain, and the Plaintiff tried to observe the progress by judging that the scarcity was a pain that occurred frequently after scarcitying.

On December 8, 2014, the Plaintiff is the Defendant.