Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,213,920 as well as 5% per annum from July 6, 2014 to September 9, 2016 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. In the event that the Defendant’s liability for damages occurred (hereinafter “instant accident”), the Plaintiff’s management operation (around June 5, 2015, the Plaintiff leased the following vehicles from the IMW535D vehicles (hereinafter “Non-MW53D vehicles”) parked in the surrounding parking lot, which was under dispute between the parties, or under dispute between the parties, and the Plaintiff’s management operation of the Plaintiff (including each number), which was parked in the surrounding parking lot. The Plaintiff’s management operation (around June 5, 2015, the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of the vehicle)’s vehicle C BMW53d vehicles (hereinafter “instant vehicle”), which was infinited separately used by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant vehicle”), may be recognized by comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings in subparagraphs 1 through 3, 7, and 10 (including each number), and subparagraphs 1 and 2.
According to the above facts, the defendant, as the contractor of the construction project, must take measures such as controlling the parking lot surrounding the construction site, moving the vehicle of this case, etc., or covering the cover with the vehicle of this case parked around the construction site, but neglected to take such measures. However, the defendant caused the accident of this case by negligence.
Therefore, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident.
2. Scope of liability for damages
A. In full view of the results of the fact-finding by the appraiser D of this Court on the appraiser D of this Court, the vehicle repair cost of this case is required to carry out a crypting after removing foreign substances, such as crypt 5 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the fact-finding by this Court on appraiser D of this Court. In full view of the whole purport of the arguments, it is necessary to carry out a crypting after removing foreign substances, such as crypt ing for repair of the vehicle of this case. The 1.6 million won of the repair cost of the vehicle of this case is divided into crying with crying materials, and the cost of this material is 1.6 million won to 1.6 million won (including the smoke cost, including 1.0 million won to 1.6 million won).
On April 4, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) hosting the instant vehicle favorable to others; and (b) hosting the glass strings.