Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle by obtaining a franchise.

On February 20, 2014, the Defendant driven the said vehicle on February 20, 2017:0, driving the said vehicle on the port side of the Suwon-si water zone, driving the said vehicle on the road surface, leading it to the right-hand bypass from the water surface to about 20 km from the water surface to the water surface.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service has a road to reduce speed and to see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to drive safely.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the victim D(W, 78 years old) and E(W, E(W, 66 years old) who cross the crosswalk from the right side of the crosswalk to the left side in accordance with the pedestrian signals was not considered as the full part of the defendant's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the said D, such as the misappropriation of elbows, which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and suffered injury to the said E, which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2) and Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing of the selective sentencing of the punishment is that there is no record of criminal punishment by the defendant, the vehicle operated by the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance, the traffic accident of this case is shocking the victims with the crosswalk according to the pedestrian signals, the injured party D is serious, and the recommended type of general traffic accident according to the sentencing guidelines (the injury of the traffic accident) is the basic area (the injury of the traffic accident between April and October, and the special person): there is no person who has the basic area (the injury of the traffic accident) according to the sentencing guidelines.