logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2017.10.27 2017고단765
업무상횡령
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, for six months, for six months, and for eight months, for each of the defendants C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on September 20, 2016, in the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for six months of imprisonment for a violation of road traffic law (unlicensed Driving). The above judgment became final and conclusive on September 28, 2016.

Defendant

B On July 16, 2015, the Daejeon District Court sentenced imprisonment for a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) to 8 months, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 24, 2015.

Defendant

A and E ( currently in the middle of the case of a funeral institution) are the employees of the “H”, who are the cooperation firm of the Corporation in the team of G TF Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”).

Defendant

B served as the site manager of F's "I", and Defendant C as the site manager of F's electrical construction cooperation company, respectively.

Han Part L is a transport source belonging to L, who delivers F’s door-to-doors brought into and taken out, and M(hereinafter “MB”) is an employee of F’s subcontractor for electrical construction, P is an employee of F’s “O”, who is a F’s subcontractor for electrical construction, and R is an employee of F’s on-site complaint of “ Q” as a F’s subcontractor for electrical construction, and R is an employee of F’s on-site complaint of “S”, respectively.

The victim F subcontracted construction to a large number of collaborative companies, purchased electric wires necessary for the execution of the above construction at the expense of the injured party, and supplied them to the collaborative company. Under a contractual relationship between the injured party and each collaborative company, the victim instructed each collaborative company to return all remaining electric wires after the execution of the electrical construction to the "waste cable storage box" installed in the open storage site in G factory, and occupied and managed the remaining remaining electric wires by installing corrective devices in the surrounding area and posting security guards. As such, each collaborative company was in the position of occupational possession and storage for the injured party after the execution of the electrical construction.

During that process, Defendants and E, K, MB, P, and R have remaining electric wires after the execution of electrical construction above F.

arrow