1. Defendant A, B, and C shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of 6,00,000 won.

2. The defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the head of FF G branch sales division, Defendant B’s branch director of the above branch, Defendant C’s director of FF agricultural cooperative, Defendant D’s president of the above agricultural cooperative.

On March 2016, the Defendants additionally purchased isolated rice from the market in 2015 through an open competitive bid from the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for the purpose of stabilizing the value of rice in the mountain area through the preferential purchase of rice owned by a farmer, and the farmers become aware of the fact that they can participate in the bidding only through agricultural cooperatives or RPC (rice processing complex). Upon entering into an entrustment contract with a farmer, H entered into a sales contract with the farmer and entered into a sales contract with the farmer and entered into a settlement of accounts, and then, the farmer is in possession of the farmer after the completion of the settlement of accounts with the farmer. Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to participate in the bidding by preparing false documents as if the farmer participated in the bidding through the Agricultural Cooperative.

Accordingly, Defendant A: (a) at the office of FF G branch office of the Republic of Korea, Nam-si, Nam-si, Nam-si; (b) as if 20 farmers, including J, applied for the participation in the said tender, Defendant A prepared a false statement by farm household; and (c) documents to the effect that Defendant B, C, and D will participate in the tender at 23,200 Garo, each of which is owned by the farm household; and (d) Defendant B, C, and D submitted the separate name report, etc. of the above farm household to the National Federation of the Agricultural Cooperative; and (e) obtained AD (K) bid for the said agricultural household’s “TA” in the name of the Agricultural Cooperative.

Since then, Defendant A was awarded a bid for KRW 1,101,470,000 for rice not owned by a farming household by entering into the bid for additional rice purchase in the city isolated rice market in 2015 after connecting the Internet pre-sale system, which is an Internet pre-sale system, by using a computer installed in the above branch office around the 30th of the same month.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the fair bid of the government by deceptive means.

b)a summary of the evidence;