beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and fine of 60,000,000 won, Defendant B’s fine of 5,000,000 won, Defendant C’s fine of 2,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] Defendant B and C were sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and six months for each crime, etc. on July 25, 2014, and the judgment was finalized on August 2, 2014. On November 30, 2015, the Gwangju District Court sentenced the suspended sentence of imprisonment for six months for fraud, etc. and the judgment was finalized on December 8, 2015.
[2] Defendant A was elected as the president of a cooperative of LAF on April 16, 2007 (hereinafter “LAF”) and served as the president of the cooperative until March 20, 2015. Defendant B is an operator of M; Defendant C is M business; Defendant C is a guidance sales business of LAF; Defendant D is a guidance sales business of LAF; Defendant E is a person who worked as the head of the team of the agricultural cooperative.
1. Defendant A
A. The Defendant is the executive officer of a regional agricultural cooperative, who takes overall charge of LAF’s affairs on behalf of LAF and takes overall charge of LAF’s affairs on behalf of LAF and is a final approval authority for the purchase of goods necessary for its business and life, promotion of LAF officers and employees, transfer, etc
1) On April 2010 and 201, the Defendant: (a) implemented a metropolitan spraying subsidy program for the purpose of enhancing the quality and competitiveness of rice of Jinju; (b) supporting the prevention of various diseases and pests; and (c) promoting the systematic control system; and (d) reducing labor force in agricultural communities and stabilizing high quality food crops; and (b) selected as a metropolitan spraying subsidy program operator for the purpose of increasing farmers’ income through the stable production of agricultural products; and (c) purchased the metropolitan spraying machine with the said subsidy. On June 2010, the Defendant selected a metropolitan spraying subsidy program operator to be implemented by LFF as a subsidy for the Agricultural Technology Center in the pertinent Jinju-si; and (d) intended to receive and receive the metropolitan spraying subsidy from LF as a bribe under the pretext of rebates.
On August 3, 2010, the Defendant demanded LAF offices located N in Jinju-si around August 3, 2010 to LAFD to make 10 percent of the value of the machinery from LAFD under the name of rebates.