1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for adding the following judgments, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) The appraiser in the first instance court's appraisal result argues that the damages caused by the instant accident were calculated based on wholesale prices claimed by the Plaintiff rather than general price data, and that the amount of damages recognized according to the appraisal at the first instance court cannot be acknowledged, since the damage caused by the instant fire was mostly slick and most of the goods located within the instant building. The appraiser's appraisal result should be respected unless the appraisal method is contrary to the empirical rule or unreasonable (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da67602, 67619, Jul. 9, 2009). The appraiser in the first instance court's appraisal result of the first instance court's appraiserF's appraisal result was calculated based on the goods lost or damaged by the instant chemical system, and it is difficult to recognize that the Plaintiff's appraisal result was considerably unreasonable or unreasonable due to the Plaintiff's lack of appraisal method through the interview at the site and the survey (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da6719, Jul. 2, 2019, 2).