1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following is added to the last part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, this case is cited in accordance with Article

【Additional Part】 The Defendant asserts that the appraiser calculated the additional expenditure amount by setting the unit price unfairly high. The appraiser’s appraisal result should be respected insofar as the appraisal method, etc. contravenes the empirical rule or is unreasonable (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Da92866, Dec. 11, 2014). There is no evidence to deem that the appraisal result is considerably erroneous, such as contrary to the empirical rule or unreasonable. The Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

2. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable.

Since the defendant's appeal is without merit, it is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.