logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.04.20 2016고단666
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for injury, etc. at the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on December 5, 2014.

1. On March 6, 2016, from around 18:35 to 18:50, the Defendant interfering with his duties: E, “E” operated by the victim D (n, 47 years of age) located in Gwangju Northern-gu C, which opened a restaurant on the ground that the Defendant refused to drink the alcohol, on the ground that the Defendant was refusing to do so, he would open a cooling house and open the breath, followed up the 2 Byung on the floor, followed up the breath, followed up the string, and destroyed the Defendant’s “ dead fark”.

Gwangju Baba Baba

C. He expressed a bath through several times the “Crack wres,” and interfered with the victim’s restaurant operation by force by allowing customers who were eating at the place of meals to leave.

2. The Defendant who was injured or interfered with the performance of official duties from 20:00 to 21:00 on the same day as the preceding paragraph, was arrested as a flagrant offender and transferred to the above office by the police officers who interfered with their duties and received 112 reports, such as the preceding paragraph, at the model department office of the police station located in Gwangju Northern-ro 172, Seo-ro, Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, and arrested the police officers dispatched to the above office.

“In the meantime, the victim slope G (38 tax) who is a police officer affiliated with FF of the above police station was able to take the Defendant into a waiting room for about one hour, and the victim was able to have his left part of the victim’s loss by tearing down his flab by sping down his flabing the flab, with his blabing hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers' criminal investigations, and at the same time, the victim failed to conduct a warning for about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement in each police statement with respect to D or G;

1. Statement in the medical certificate of G; and

1. Descriptions and images of a report on internal investigation (the details of attachment of photographs damaged by victim G);

1. The scene of damage;

arrow