logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.01.18 2016고정1940
도시및주거환경정비법위반
Text

The punishment against the Defendants shall be prescribed by a fine of two million won.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A served as the chairperson of the Promotion Committee for the Establishment of D Housing Redevelopment Project Association (hereinafter referred to as "Promotion Committee") from October 31, 2009 to November 15, 2015. From November 16, 2015, a person who works as the chairperson of the Promotion Committee on behalf of the chairperson of the Promotion Committee from November 16, 2015 to until now, and Defendant B is the representative director of E, who is engaged in the specialized maintenance business.

1. Where Defendant A intends to select a specialized management businessman of rearrangement projects, he/she shall do so through competitive bidding;

However, on December 16, 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract for specialized management services on behalf of the promotion committee with respect to B and D housing redevelopment and improvement projects on behalf of the promotion committee at the office of the company located in Gwangju Northern-gu, and the third floor, and entered into a contract for specialized management services.

Accordingly, the defendant selected a management contractor of rearrangement project without using competitive bidding methods.

2. A person who intends to be entrusted with affairs necessary for the implementation of a rearrangement project by a promoters' association or to give advice in connection therewith shall register the rearrangement project specialized management business;

However, the Defendant entered into a contract for the specialized management of the rearrangement project, which is entrusted with the work of reviewing the feasibility of the rearrangement project for A and D housing redevelopment and preparing a plan to implement the rearrangement project, as described in paragraph 1, without registering the specialized management business.

As a result, the Defendant was entrusted with the rearrangement project without registering the rearrangement project specialized management business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A contract for specialized management services for rearrangement projects;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a certificate of registration of specialized management business for rearrangement projects (a certificate of registration of an investigative record, 354);

1. Article 84-3 Subparag. 5 and Article 14(2) of the Act on the Maintenance of Urban and Residential Environments, Defendant A selected as a fine for criminal facts; Articles 85 Subparag. 9 and 69(1) of the Act on the Maintenance of Urban and Residential Environments;

arrow