A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months and by a fine not exceeding 8,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

From December 24, 2016, the Defendant leased No. 1216 of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 1216 and operated a sexual traffic business establishment.

On December 27, 2016, the Defendant received 150,000 or 160,000 won from a male who was found to have been engaged in sexual traffic at the above businesses around 12:18, 2016, in return for sexual traffic, and had the female sexual intercourse with the above male, and had the said D do the act of sexual intercourse with the above male, and around 16:46 of the same day, the Defendant had the said D do the act of sexual intercourse with the male whose name is not known and the single sexual intercourse with the above female.

As a result, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic from December 24, 2016 to December 27 of the same year.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal accidents (Internet advertisements related to sexual traffic establishments);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging, etc. Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor and the concurrent imposition of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on January 14, 2016 of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the Defendant had been issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for the crime of violating the Act on the Punishment of Acts, including sexual traffic brokerage, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on January 14, 2016, he/she again determines the same type of punishment as the order by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the fact that the Defendant left the crime of this case; (b) the fact that the Defendant recognized the facts charged; and (c) the fact that the business establishment of this case is not large in size and is short of business period; and (d) other conditions of punishment as shown in the argument of this case, including the Defendant’