logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.26 2017고단8528
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months and by a fine not exceeding seven thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 21, 2017, at a place where it is unknown at around 18:00, the Defendant connected to the mobile phone display case “C” using a mobile phone at a place where it is difficult to know, and made a conversation with a man whose name is difficult to know who wishes to engage in sexual traffic as if he were sexual traffic women, and received KRW 200,000 or KRW 40,000 per hour in return for sexual traffic, and recruited sexual traffic female D (n, 20 years of age) who employed in advance, followed the above male at a street, and had the said female sexual intercourse with the said male at a guest room where it is impossible to know the number of Macoms whose name and trade name are unknown.

Defendant arranged sexual traffic by the aforementioned method from February 20, 2017 to November 21, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Seizure records;

1. Investigation report (the details related to non-control and calculation of crime period against the accused);

1. Investigation report (a statement that recruits a person to buy stocks with a hosting app “C”)

1. Investigation report (in relation to the brokerage of sexual traffic on November 21, 190, the enforcement date);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 19(2)1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as arranging the selective sexual traffic, etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the concurrent imposition of imprisonment and fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, the former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.;

1. In light of the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is highly detrimental to society by commercializing sex and undermining sound sexual culture and good morals, and that the act of committing the instant crime even though there was a history of punishment for the same kind of power, etc., the liability for the relevant crime seems to be unlimited, however, while recognizing and opposing the Defendant’s mistake, the same is re-existent.

arrow