beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case being cited or added as follows. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The phrase “self-fashion” of the second 10 parallels in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added to the subway “fashion. 8” of the first 6 parallels in the fourth 6 parallels of the judgment, and “9,10 copies” shall be added. From the fourth bottom of the judgment of first 10 parallels in the fourth 9,10 parallels in the first 4 parallels of the judgment, the fact that the accident in this case occurred may be recognized.
After the completion of the conference, the Plaintiff got home to G and F with a subway, and went into the Samsung Central Station after having her fested into Samsung Central Station, but went out of the history to get off a taxi while entering the subway, and going out of the history to get off a taxi. On November 8, 2016, the Plaintiff turned out from India one time at India around 00:29,00,000, more than four times, for the following reasons: (a) 00:18, the Plaintiff got out of the history to get off a taxi; and (b) 00:29,00:30, more than four times, and more than four times, the instant accident occurred. The Plaintiff came out from India and the instant case involving the instant accident involving the passage of delivery and the roadway. The May 3rd of the first instance judgment, referring to the fact that there is no evidence that there is no evidence to get off a taxi.
③ The instant accident occurred in the course of the Plaintiff’s returning home after the end of the ceremony, and the Plaintiff cannot be said to have exceeded the net course of his returning home.
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.