logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.05.30 2019누34977
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment except for the following parts.

(1) The grounds alleged by the Plaintiff in this Court, while filing an appeal, are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence presented by the first instance court and this court are examined, the fact-finding and the judgment of the first instance court that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). [The part which was modified] The five-half of the first instance court’s fifth to six-six of the two cases

The May 13th of the judgment of the first instance shall be deleted from 16th to 16th.

The 6th five parallel judgments of the first instance court "Fence from July 12, 2016 to March 13, 2016" shall be applied "Fence on July 12, 2016 and the 13th day of the same month."

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow