A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B car in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On October 19, 2018, the Defendant came to proceed to E from the port side where the “D” front of the “D” road in Asia-si, Asan-si.

At the time, the passage of other vehicles was frequent, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating and safely driving the steering company of the motor vehicle, and thus, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not discover the Gysta car of the victim F (ma, 42 years old), which was in the atmosphere of the signal at the same line of math, due to negligence while under the influence of alcohol, and did not discover the said car, and shocked the back part of the said car with the front part of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim F and the victim H (V, 42 years old) who was a passenger of the said rocketing car by occupational negligence as above, for approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of Drinking Measures) requires a police officer to comply with a drinking test by inserting a drinking measuring instrument twice twice, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, by making it possible to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, while driving the said B car with the same time, place, and under the influence of drinking, after receiving a report on 12 of the said “1,” the occurrence of a traffic accident as referred to in the said “1,” which occurred while driving the said B car under the influence of drinking, the Defendant did not comply with a police officer’s request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.