The defendant shall be innocent.

1. No manufacturer, manufacturer-seller or seller of cosmetics shall place any indication or advertisement likely to mislead consumers into thinking the cosmetics are medicines, or any other indication or advertisement likely to deceive or mislead consumers;

A. On January 2016, the Defendant made an indication or advertisement likely to mislead himself/herself as a medicine. On the Internet site (E) operated by himself/herself, the Defendant posted an advertisement “F” (hereinafter referred to as the “cosmetic in this case”) on the cosmetic’s website (E), which is a cosmetic, to obtain not only the primary improvement, but also the external completion/minium effects during the three-dimensional period, and the cosmetic’s flick content / glick with the flick with the flick with the flick with the flick with the flick with the flick with the flick content. In the heart, Pepsisid’s continuous flick effect with the flive effect of double printing on the surface and the heart, thereby making it erroneous for the Defendant to have erred in recognizing it as a medicine or advertisement.

B. The Defendant posted other indications or advertisements that are different from facts or are likely to mislead consumers, at the same time and place as the above A. A. The Defendant advertised the cosmetic of this case on the Internet site, such as the above A. A. The facts are as follows: although the cosmetic of this case is a functional cosmetics for the improvement of liquor, which are deemed functional cosmetics excluded from food and drug safety sources, since the cosmetic of this case contains Arabic ingredients and are regarded as functional cosmetics, it is visible (VOLUFILE), Boar Puss (VOLUUUS), Ear Pepsisisid (TRI-PPDE) ingredients in the skin of this case, and Pepsisisid (TRI-PPE) ingredients in the skin of this case.