logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.03.06 2017가단103458
건물명도 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. 14,00,000 won and November 26, 2017

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: To be as specified in attached Form 1;

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. Dismissal portion: Since there is no ground to deem that the Defendant is liable to pay the portion of KRW 700,000 per month exceeding the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the amount of KRW 2.2 million per month agreed upon among the 2.9 million per month for the Plaintiff’s claim for payment for the period after November 26, 2017, the claim for this part of the claim is dismissed (if the Plaintiff, the owner, bears management expenses, etc. other than the amount of rent equivalent to the amount of rent borne by the Plaintiff after November 26, 2017 due to the Defendant’s occupancy and use of apartment, the Plaintiff may claim a return of unjust enrichment, etc. separate from the lawsuit in this case, and can be naturally deducted from the lease deposit

arrow