The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (nine months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflected, and the vehicle operated by the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance policy is favorable to the sentencing.

However, on January 28, 2013, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of five million won or more due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act in Gangnam Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on the following grounds: (a) the defendant committed again a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) without being convicted of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dangerous Driving) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dangerous Driving) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dangerous Driving) by the defendant; (b) the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dangerous Driving) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dangerous Driving) and the blood alcohol concentration of the violation of the Road Traffic Act is considerably higher than 0.178%; and (c) the motive, process and consequence of each of the crimes in this case; (d) the defendant's age, character, environment, and other conditions of sentencing as seen earlier, even if there are more favorable punishment, it cannot be reversed.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.