1. The defendant's delivery of apartment units as stated in the attached list from the plaintiff at the same time, and at the same time, KRW 125,00,000 to the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 20, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on a deposit basis of KRW 125,000,000 with respect to the apartment as indicated in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant apartment”) and with the lease period from January 29, 2016 to January 28, 2018 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). At that time, the Plaintiff paid KRW 125,00,000 to the Defendant.

B. Since then, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to extend the lease term of the instant lease agreement by January 28, 2019.

C. On November 2018, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that he/she had no intent to renew the instant lease contract after the expiration of the lease term. At the time of the closing of argument in the instant case, the Plaintiff occupies the instant apartment at the time of the closing

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts found in the judgment on the cause of the claim, the lease contract of this case was terminated upon the expiration of the period. The defendant is obligated to return the deposit amount of KRW 125,000,000 to the plaintiff simultaneously with the delivery of the apartment of this case from the plaintiff.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and acceptable.