1. The defendant shall deliver real estate stated in the attached list from the plaintiff to the plaintiff at the same time, and at the same time, KRW 140,000,000 to the plaintiff.

On October 14, 2016, the Plaintiff leased the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant apartment”) from the Defendant as the lease deposit amount of KRW 140,00,000,00, and the lease term of KRW 140,000 on October 23, 2016 to October 22, 2018 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”). At that time, the Plaintiff paid the said lease deposit to the Defendant, and the delivery of the instant apartment by paying the said lease deposit, may be recognized as either there is no dispute between the parties, or the purport of the entire pleadings as stated in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2.

According to the facts of recognition, since the contract of this case was terminated upon the expiration of the period of validity, the defendant is obligated to return the lease deposit amount of KRW 140,000,000 to the plaintiff as well as to receive the apartment of this case from the plaintiff.

Although the defendant alleged that the lease contract of this case was implicitly renewed, it is only acknowledged that the plaintiff notified the defendant on October 2, 2018 that the lease contract of this case was not renewed, in full view of the purport of the whole argument in Gap evidence No. 3, and therefore, the above assertion is not acceptable.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for the reasons and it is so decided as per Disposition.