A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 25, 2017, the Defendant is going to go to the telecom without paying accommodation expenses at the OOO telecom in the city of public administration around 06:07.

By doing so, the above Moel employee D was punished for a dispute with D, and the 112 report was made by the 112 person, stating that “it was impossible to have paid accommodation expenses in full.”

After that, when the Defendant received a request for returning home from a slopeF from a police officer belonging to the 112th E District Police Station, he was arrested in the act of interference with the performance of official duties, and was arrested in the act of interference with the performance of official duties, and went on the back of the G patrol police station and escorted the suspect.

Along with the face of F one head, approximately two weeks of treatment was taken by the head, and the inside and outside of the mouths and the oral mouths were required.

As such, by assaulting F twice, the Defendant interfered with police officers’ legitimate performance of duties in relation to the handling of police officers’ 112 reporting duties and the prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of crimes, and inflicted injury on the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and H;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. 112 Report/Handling table, and each investigation report (as to attachment of the report/handling statement by a damaged police officer at the time of dispatch to the scene);

1. A written opinion, on-site photographs of the case, and black images CDs that interfere with the performance of official duties [the defendant denies the crime, but can be sufficiently recognized according to each of the above evidence.

Defendant appears to be unsatisfy and unsatisfyd at the time.)

Application of Statutes

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include a number of criminal records of the same kind, the denial of the crimes, and the denial of the crimes.