The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On May 31, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 12:15, the construction company located in Namyang-si, B as security guards; (b) sought a company from the victim D (the age of 61) on the grounds that the victim D (the age of 61) was said to have only the Defendant’s company; (c) took a bath for the victim E (the age of 51); and (d) assaulted the victim E’s face and appearance by drinking and drinking; and (d) assaulted at least five times on the same ground that the victim D continued to contact with the said company.

2. The reasons for dismissing the prosecution of this case are the crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement bound in the trial records, it can be acknowledged that the victims have withdrawn their wish to punish the defendant on August 14, 2014, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.