logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.02.11 2019고단3990
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Defendant 40,000 won to P, 100,000 won to C, and 60,000 won to E.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power” On April 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Daegu Correctional Institution on September 12, 2016. On January 19, 2018, the same court sentenced one year and six months to imprisonment for fraud, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Busan Correctional Institution on December 1, 2018.

On December 31, 2018, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “The 2019 Highest 390, the Defendant would send the above Twit ticket by registered mail to the victim who visited the victim by accessing RS, an Internet site, at Qmomo-gu Qmo-gu Qmo-gu, Daegu, 2018.”

However, since the defendant did not have the above pockets, even if he received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above pockets to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1,600,000 from the victim’s U bank account (V) in the name of the Defendant, and by deceiving the victims on a total of 73 occasions from around that time to July 24, 2019, and received a total of KRW 12,089,600 from the victims, as described in the attached list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victims.

On May 16, 2019, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “the sale of gallon S9 mobile phones will be made” by accessing RS, an Internet site, at a place where the location is unknown, and that “the sale of galloned S9 mobile phones will be made,” and that “the first remittance of money will be made to the victim W who contacted the victim.”

However, since the defendant did not have the above mobile phone, even if he received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above twit ticket to the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim and belongs to it.

arrow