The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The circumstances are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all the crimes of this case as to the grounds for appeal (unfair assertion) and agreed to dispose of and not to drive the vehicle of this case, that the vehicle of sea driving the defendant was covered by a comprehensive insurance, and that the victims are seeking a preference against the defendant at the investigation stage.

However, the Defendant has already been punished several times due to drinking, unlicensed driving, etc., and in particular, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the period of the repeated crime after the completion of the sentence of imprisonment on October 27, 2012 due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) on the grounds of violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc., and committed each of the instant crimes during the period of the repeated crime. The Defendant’s blood alcohol level is not shorter than 0.146% at the time of operation, and the risk of the occurrence of a traffic accident involving a damaged vehicle was realized, and the Defendant seems to have been driving for a more drinking time in Eup at Eup at the time of the instant crime, and there are no other circumstances to consider the circumstance of the instant crime. Considering the various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, character, family relationship, circumstances, motive and motive of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s judgment cannot be deemed to be unreasonable even if considering the different circumstances claimed by the Defendant.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.