The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the grounds for appeal) is that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime, etc., may be considered for the sake of the Defendant.

However, on June 24, 201, the defendant had a record of criminal punishment several times due to drinking driving, and in particular, the Cheongju District Court completed the sentence of imprisonment for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving on April 24, 201) and again commits the crime of this case during the repeated period after the completion of the sentence of 4 months, etc., and the risk of the accident was occurred as the blood alcohol level at the time of driving of this case does not fall short of 0.146%, and the traffic accident in which the damaged vehicle is actually being used. The risk was realized as the traffic accident occurred, and the defendant does not seem to have any urgent or inevitable situation at the time of driving of the crime of this case, and there are no other special circumstances to be considered in the circumstance of the crime. Considering the various sentencing conditions stated in the record, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below (six months) is too unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.