1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 13,711,570 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 2,145,112 to Plaintiff B; and each of them, from August 12, 2015 to September 2017.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) The Plaintiff A is the Plaintiff’s vehicle CbombaCC 2.0 TDI (hereinafter “Plaintiff”).

The Defendant is the owner of the Dsch Rexroth (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”)

(2) On August 12, 2015, Plaintiff B, the father of Plaintiff A, driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle at around 12:14, and driven the front e-mail of the window in Changwon-si, the front e-mail of the window in the Changwon-si, coming to a two-lane one-lane, and stopped on the front stop line of the crosswalk in accordance with the signal, etc. on the front side of the crosswalk, and the Defendant, who was followed by the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the same line, moved to the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) / without dispute, entry of Gap’s evidence 1 through 4 and the purport of the entire pleadings and photographs.

B. According to the facts found above, since the accident of this case occurred by negligence that the driver of the defendant vehicle neglected the duty of front-time care, the defendant who is the insurer is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for the damage caused by the accident of this case.

2. Scope of damages.

A. Plaintiff A1) In the instant accident involving vehicle repair costs, the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle was destroyed, and the Plaintiff A claimed KRW 11,161,740, which is the repair cost for the 10,243,570, with the repair cost. However, it is not recognized that it is necessary to repair the Plaintiff’s vehicle for the repair of the vehicle. As such, the lower repair cost out of the appraisal cost is required for the repair of the Plaintiff’s vehicle. (c) Although 10 days are required for the repair of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the Defendant provided the Plaintiff with the loan from August 12, 2015 to August 23, 2015, the lending cost is not recognized.

3. In the instant accident, the Plaintiff A was unable to recover from the aesthetic obstacle and restitution of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident, thereby borrowing the 3,380,000 U.S. car from the U.S. car.