logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.07.23 2019고단4434
부정수표단속법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who actually operates C in the case of South Korea.

On July 20, 2017, the Defendant entered into a check contract with D Bank under the name of D Bank C, and traded the check of shares.

On August 29, 2018, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number “H”, “50,000,000 won”, “C’s number per unit of D Bank,” which is named as “C’s name,” in order to secure the obligation to borrow a loan from the F located in Yongsan-gu, Young-gu, Busan-gu, U.S., and the date of issuance, and subsequently, issued one copy of the D Bank’s number of units under the name of D Bank C, which is named as “ October 12, 2018,” and the said check was presented for payment to the I Bank’s offset branch on October 12, 2018, but was not paid due to

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Illegal Check Control Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention: Article 2 (4) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act;

(c) Recall of checks after prosecution;

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow