1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiffs' preliminary claims added at the trial are dismissed.

3...

1. The court's explanation concerning this part is as follows: (a) the reason why the court should explain this part is as follows: (b) the part of the first instance judgment No. 2, No. 19, and No. 3 (hereinafter "the Intervenor Medical Foundation"); (c) the third part of the third part (hereinafter "the Intervenor's representative council"); (d) the "the Intervenor Medical Foundation" in No. 3; and (e) the "the Intervenor's representative council" in No. 7, No. 9, 10, and 12 shall be changed to the "the Intervenor's representative council"; and (e) the "the Intervenor's representative council" in No. 3, No. 7, No. 9, 10, and 12 shall be changed to the "the Intervenor's representative council"; and (e) the part corresponding to the judgment of the first instance judgment, other than deletion of the "the Intervenor's Intervenor's" in the second part of the third part, shall be cited

2. The details of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes are as shown in attached statutes;

3. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the Intervenor’s motion for intervention is legitimate are as follows: (a) the Intervenor’s Medical Foundation’s each part of the 3th instance judgment, 19th, 4th, 2, 5, 7, 9, 11th, 3th, 3th, 19 through 4th, 11th, except that the Intervenor’s Medical Foundation’s each part of the 3rd, 4th, 4th, 7, and 9 through 11th, is the same as that of the 3rd,

4. Judgment on the non-existence of standing to sue

A. As the main defense of safety, the defendant and the intervenor asserted that as nine sectional owners of the apartment of this case and five lessees of this case, the plaintiffs only have an economic interest in the disposition of this case, and they do not have standing to sue since there is no legal interest.

B. Even if a third party is not the direct counterpart of an administrative disposition, if the interests protected by law are infringed by such administrative disposition, a revocation suit shall be instituted and a decision of propriety thereof shall be made.

Any benefit protected by law shall be the same as that of the relevant administrative disposition.