The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: (a) on June 1, 2015, the Defendant: (b) on the street in front of “C” located in Chuncheon-si B, around 03:40 on June 1, 2015; (c) on the ground that the Defendant was punished by Si expenses for the reason that female-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child (20 years old)

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the F, E, and D’s written agreement bound in the records, the victim F, E, and D withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on August 3, 2015, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.