The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On June 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 22:20 on June 12, 2013, around the 1st Eel of the victim D (the 53-year old-old), while working in the above me while drinking in the above me; (b) upon entering the above me to drink with her fee and drinking; and (c) upon entering the above me to draw up the victim’s key, her behavior; (d) the victim was pushed up the victim’s left hand with her hand; and (e) the victim was knicked with the victim’s back her hand, she brought the victim’s back her hand to the knife; and (e) the victim was able to take such action from her husband; and (e) the victim was able to take such action; and (e) the victim was able to take such action from her husband; and (e) the victim was called “the knisher,” she called the victim, she called “the kest,”.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 298 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 11574, Dec. 18, 2012) and can be prosecuted only upon the victim’s complaint under Article 306 of the same Act.

However, according to the records of this case, on October 25, 2013, the victim, after the prosecution of this case, submitted to this court a written agreement that "the victim will not be held liable for civil or criminal liability against the defendant in the future in relation to this case, and the defendant does not want to be punished." Thus, it is reasonable to deem that the victim has cancelled the complaint against the defendant when submitting the above written agreement. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.