logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.10.22 2014고단2870
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[2014 Highest 2870] The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA rocketing car.

1. On September 30, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Measures Taken after Accidents) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”) and the Defendant driving the said vehicle at around September 19, 2014, and driving the agricultural road in the direction from the chilling side to the direction of the chilling side, Seoyang-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.

The driver has been on duty to drive a motor vehicle.

At the time, there was a FW car operated by the victim E at the rear side of a car operated by the defendant, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to check and keep the safety by properly examining the rear side and the left and right of the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the said part of the BMW passenger vehicle behind the said rocketing passenger vehicle by negligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures, such as destroying property and confirming the situation of damage, so that the said BMW car is equivalent to KRW 4,475,660, such as the exchange of the front offender by negligence in the above business.

2. The Defendant is a person who violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act on April 15, 2009 because he/she received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Goyang Branch of the Government District District Court on March 15, 2009; and on January 17, 2014 from the same support, he/she received a summary order of KRW 4 million as a fine for the same crime, respectively, on at least two occasions.

On September 30, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of 0.059% alcohol level without obtaining the driver’s license on September 30, 2014, and driven the said car at approximately 7km from the front of the construction site of the so-called Pari-gu, Pari-gu, Pari-si, Pari-si, Pari-si, Pari-si, Pari-si, Pari-si, Pari-si, Pari-si, P

3. The holder of a vehicle violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not subscribe to mandatory insurance;

arrow