logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.14 2015누72674
화물자동차운송사업불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of a part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this part is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

The second part of the judgment of the first instance is "B" in the second part is "E".

The second part of the second part of the judgment of the first instance is “the instant vehicle” and “the previous vehicle”.

In the second and third instances of the judgment of the first instance, the term "Incheon District Court" shall be "Jincheon District Court".

Part III of the first instance judgment " Trucking Transport Business Act" shall be construed as "former Trucking Transport Business Act (amended by Act No. 7100 of Jan. 20, 2004 and wholly amended by Act No. 8979 of Mar. 21, 2008)".

The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance states that "Until December 31, 2004, by a person who has title trust of a truck" in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance is "from December 31, 2004, a person who has been entrusted with the transportation business after the title trust of a truck to a company of a branch office and operated the transportation business."

Each of the 4th, 8, 9 and 10 acts in the judgment of the first instance shall be " December 31, 2004" and " December 30, 2004."

Each of the "the supplementary provisions of this case" in the fourth and fourteenth of the judgment of the first instance shall be referred to as "the supplementary provisions of this case".

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow