A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:30 on October 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) obtained the victim’s name bank account in the name of a national bank account in the name of the victim; (b) obtained the victim’s name of the third party, and acquired it by deceptioning it by fraud, with the following purport: (c) the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the purchase price even if he purchases the Oba; and (d) the victim C did not have the intent or ability to pay the purchase price; (c) the victim would purchase the Obama in KRW 50,000,000,000,000 won; and (d) the purchase price would be deposited by November 15, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant statutory provisions of Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts have several criminal records of the same kind o (the victim’s punishment is not to be imposed, and the damage is to be recovered) in the area where the sentence is to be mitigated (the victim’s punishment is not imposed). On October 20, 201, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the same kind of crime at the Seoul Central District Court for six months, and even after the suspended sentence was sentenced for two years, several types of crimes of the same kind were committed. In particular, even if the court was sentenced to a fine of two million won for the same crime as this case in the instant case on October 11, 2012, it is decided as per Disposition by taking into account the following factors: (a) a person was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor, taking into account the fact that the person committed the instant crime and was sentenced to a fine of two million won for the same crime