logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.01.06 2015고단4499
공무집행방해등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) arrested as a current offender a slope C belonging to the Gwangju Northern Police Station B District of the Police Station B of the Gwangju Northern Police Station, who was called upon to report around 02:5 on October 19, 2015; and (b) was connected to the Gwangju Northern Police Station B of the Police Station B of the Gwangju Northern Police Station B of the Police Station; and (c) determined whether he/she “this Chewing feass, matrins, and meat;

- - - - - - - - - -

Maneekel kelelelel kelelelel in front of the Republic of Korea

Mali L. h. B. B. B. B. B. B. the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties on arrest of flagrant offenders, criminal investigation, etc. in his/her hand at the right side of C.

2. On October 19, 2015, at around 03:30 on October 19, 2015, the Defendant damaged things used by public offices by putting the police officers in a bridge office, putting the disturbance on the table of the office, leaving the 50,000 won of the market price set up on the table of the office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes entered in the police statement protocol against C;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) The point of obstructing the performance of official duties in the judgment: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of imprisonment);

(b) Damage to public goods in its holding: Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 (1) of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Social Service Orders and the observation of protection;

1. Type 1 (Interference with the Execution of Official Duties) (Determination in the sphere of recommendation), mitigated area (determination in the sphere of recommendation), six months to one year and four months; and

2. Class 1 (Special Sentencing) [In the event that a person has minor value of the article that has become invalid and destroyed as a result of interfering with the performance of official duties] - In the event that the value of the article that has become invalid and destroyed as a result of the reduction [decision in the sphere of recommendation] mitigated area [the scope of recommendation].

arrow